|
|
|
|
|
Factor
|
Median of the differences |
P-value: test of no difference |
Significant (5%)
|
|
Speech |
0
|
0.508 |
No
|
|
Sociability |
-3
|
0.0005 |
Yes
|
|
Sensory/ Cognitive awareness |
-1
|
0.0117 |
Yes
|
|
Health/ physical/ behaviour |
-5
|
0.2668 |
No
|
|
Total |
-9
|
0.0005 |
Yes
|
These calculations show that there were improvements for the group of children in Sociability, Sensory/Cognitive awareness, and the total score.
The changes in Sociability, Sensory – Cognitive and the Total scores are significant. That is, we can confidently say they were not as a result of chance but likely to have been due to AIT.
|
Factor
|
Median of the differences |
P-value: test of no difference |
Significant (5%)
|
|
Irritabilty |
-11
|
0.002 |
Yes
|
|
Lethargy |
-6
|
0.0386 |
Yes
|
|
Stereotypy |
-4.5
|
0.508 |
No
|
|
Hyperactivity |
-16
|
0.0063 |
Yes
|
|
Inappropriate speech |
-4
|
0.289 |
No
|
|
Total |
-10
|
0.0063 |
Yes
|
These results show that there were improvements for the group in all the areas covered by this checklist. There were significant changes in the areas of Irritibility, lethargy, Hyperactivity, and the Total scores. That is, we can confidently say they were not as a result of chance but are likely to have been due to AIT.
CONCLUSION
To quote Dr Steven Edelson (Autism Research Institute):
‘…a review of the available literature on AIT has produced 23 studies with positive results and only 3 claiming no benefits from AIT. While none of the research done thus far on AIT is of Nobel Prize quality, the positive studies are far more credible than those with negative results. As we point out in our comments, the 3 studies that claim no benefits are deeply flawed, with conclusions that are not supported by the research procedures nor the research data.
'AIT does, in fact, appear to be a worthwhile, frequently beneficial intervention which confers improvement in a number of symptoms, in a significant proportion of disorders on the autism spectrum.’
![]()
|
|